The views below are submitted by registered users of evertonfc.com and do not necessarily reflect the views of Everton Football Club. View the Blueroom acceptable usage policy.

Delight to Disbelief. What was the thinking behind that line-up David????
  • xxSANDMANxx
    Posts: 194
    Delight was seeing Neville back at right back and Jags back to the centre were there best.

    But splitting up best left sided combo in premier league?? Why?

    dont understand why pienaar started on right and mirallas on left? only changed after 1-0 down.
    its about bloody time to switch fella back to midfield fulltime too, need extra quality coming from the centre badly, perhaps start the next few games with the positioning you finished this game,with fella can easily be pushed forward if game needs tinkering during match.

    Man u were too well prepared tactically today, but i still wonder what would have happened had moyes not unsettled the team with switching pienaar and mirallas before the off?
    Took the main everton threat away nice idea moyes i salute you
  • sambo applecart
    Posts: 24,118

    Delight was seeing Neville back at right back and Jags back to the centre were there best.

    But splitting up best left sided combo in premier league?? Why?

    dont understand why pienaar started on right and mirallas on left? only changed after 1-0 down.
    its about bloody time to switch fella back to midfield fulltime too, need extra quality coming from the centre badly, perhaps start the next few games with the positioning you finished this game,with fella can easily be pushed forward if game needs tinkering during match.

    Man u were too well prepared tactically today
    , but i still wonder what would have happened had moyes not unsettled the team with switching pienaar and mirallas before the off?
    Took the main everton threat away nice idea moyes i salute you


    -----------------



    100% agree with this. 
  • david14
    Posts: 279

    Delight was seeing Neville back at right back and Jags back to the centre were there best.

    But splitting up best left sided combo in premier league?? Why?

    dont understand why pienaar started on right and mirallas on left? only changed after 1-0 down.
    its about bloody time to switch fella back to midfield fulltime too, need extra quality coming from the centre badly, perhaps start the next few games with the positioning you finished this game,with fella can easily be pushed forward if game needs tinkering during match.

    Man u were too well prepared tactically today, but i still wonder what would have happened had moyes not unsettled the team with switching pienaar and mirallas before the off?
    Took the main everton threat away nice idea moyes i salute you


    -----------------



    i don't think it made too much difference to be honest with you


  • xxSANDMANxx
    Posts: 194
    but you think pienaar starting out right was good? Baines only half the player without pienaar to back him up it disrupted the whole usual setup never got goin til 1 down when re-switched. was poor managing plus anichebe wasnt getting any change out of vidic this should have been sorteed out by the boss too before the 2nd half. victor relies on using his strength so playing v vidic didnt suit should have been moved or took off
  • brboy1
    Posts: 930
    Yea,I agree or else how has SAF kept his job?

    What a stupid statement.

    We bossed the first half & lost our way second.

    Happens in loads of games.

    Get over it.

    SAF is better than DM.

    News please,not history.
  • xxSANDMANxx
    Posts: 194
    bossed 10mins thats it after 1-0 down it was another howler from moyes
  • beardblue boy
    Posts: 381
    How about Moyes knew that SAF was expecting Peanuts n Baines down the left and tried to do something he wasnt expecting????
  • xxSANDMANxx
    Posts: 194
    yes beard i believe this was the case outfoxed by sir alex who had highligted pienaar to disguise the fact he was gona take fella out of the game, moyes fell for it and weakend the team also could moyes not have moved fella at some point b4 game was out of reach?
  • david14
    Posts: 279

    but you think pienaar starting out right was good? Baines only half the player without pienaar to back him up it disrupted the whole usual setup never got goin til 1 down when re-switched. was poor managing plus anichebe wasnt getting any change out of vidic this should have been sorteed out by the boss too before the 2nd half. victor relies on using his strength so playing v vidic didnt suit should have been moved or took off


    -----------------



    he shouldn't have done it but we would have got beat regardless so it doesn't matter really

    that's moyes for you though.  he's always doing stupid things and things that just aren't nessecary.  it's never straight foward with him. 

    ideally today we would have had neville right back, pienar left - mirrallas right and jelavic upfront.  for once once he puts neville right back but to make up for that he has to screw it up else were so he switches pienar and mirralas and leaves jelavic ont he bench. 
  • brboy1
    Posts: 930
    Sandman.

    Lets see what Brenda does with the 40mil for goofy.

    Stevie Me over the hill & St Jamie ****-ed.

    250 mil worth of absolute garbage.

    Your clubs nearly as bigger joke as you.

    Champions league,I'm pi--ssing myself.
  • xxSANDMANxx
    Posts: 194
    brboy1 said:

    Sandman.

    Lets see what Brenda does with the 40mil for goofy.

    Stevie Me over the hill & St Jamie ****-ed.

    250 mil worth of absolute garbage.

    Your clubs nearly as bigger joke as you.

    Champions league,I'm pi--ssing myself.


    -----------------



    what the hell is this about? who the hell is brenda?
  • xxSANDMANxx
    Posts: 194
    david14 said:

    null


    -----------------



    yes david dont know whats up with him and this tinkering this year with the unnecessary changes

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Poll

No poll attached to this discussion.

In this Discussion