The views below are submitted by registered users of evertonfc.com and do not necessarily reflect the views of Everton Football Club. View the Blueroom acceptable usage policy.

257,885,161 – 1, should look like...
  • IdiAminDaDa
    Posts: 7,959
    this, like: 257,885,161 – 1 F**k, can't ge' the superscript to work like...

  • mikraz
    Posts: 2,182
    Its mad that 57,885,161 is prime never mind 2 raised to that power minus 1, the mind boggles, 39 days to check if you think how many calculations a modern computer can make per second its just f**kin incredible.
  • OGV
    Posts: 909
    So, if I've read that right... the next big prime would be 2 to the power of that new prime minus 1... but they don't have the computing power to calculate it?
  • Winston Wolfe
    Posts: 4,925
    We are such an intellectual bunch on here.....

    Hehe....I just farted.
  • IdiAminDaDa
    Posts: 7,959
    OGV said:

    So, if I've read that right... the next big prime would be 2 to the power of that new prime minus 1... but they don't have the computing power to calculate it?


    -----------------



    F**k knows mate, more Mikraz's area like...
  • mikraz
    Posts: 2,182
    OGV said:

    So, if I've read that right... the next big prime would be 2 to the power of that new prime minus 1... but they don't have the computing power to calculate it?


    -----------------



    not with any certainty ogv, 2^11 -1= 2047 which is divisable by 23 and 89, so although there is the possibilty that it would be prime the rule does not apply to all prime numbers(however it is probably the best method we have for testing for prime numbers).
  • OGV
    Posts: 909
    Got yer... but if that is the case... surely there is scope to modify the formula once you identified instances in which it doesn't generate a prime?
  • mikraz
    Posts: 2,182
    I imagine the people working on the GIMPS project are trying to figure that out, one things for sure and that is cleverer people than me have tried and failed to come up with a foolproof method of calculating primes. We don't fully understand them and its unlikely that we will any time soon. 57,885,161 is a relatively small number and there are a lot of prime numbers to test in between that and our new largest prime, good luck to them I say.
  • Deus Ex Machina
    Posts: 3,433
    Why do we need to know such high primes? Or is it just the challenge?
  • OGV
    Posts: 909

    Why do we need to know such high primes? Or is it just the challenge?


    -----------------



    It's for fun.. and now because they win cash for finding them... I've had excel fired up since I read the article... reckon I'll crack it by Sunday...
  • IdiAminDaDa
    Posts: 7,959
    Deus Ex Machina said:Why do we need to know such high primes? Or is it just the challenge?
    -----------------

    No practical application tha' I know of,
    yet...
  • cjohno
    Posts: 5,465
    what happened to the bumming posts ffs like have i logged onto university challenged
  • IdiAminDaDa
    Posts: 7,959
    cjohno said:

    what happened to the bumming posts ffs like have i logged onto university challenged


    -----------------



    Hahahaha yer can't f**in' win in this place like...
  • mikraz
    Posts: 2,182



    No practical application tha' I know of,
    yet...


    -----------------



    Hard to apply when we don't fully understand them, however we use them in encryption and psuedorandom number generators.
  • mikraz
    Posts: 2,182
    cjohno said:

    what happened to the bumming posts ffs like have i logged onto university challenged


    -----------------



    Ffs like, get a bit cerebral and someone brings up bumming.
  • IdiAminDaDa
    Posts: 7,959
    mikraz said:

    Ffs like, get a bit cerebral and someone brings up bumming.


    -----------------



    Hahahaha

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Poll

No poll attached to this discussion.

In this Discussion