scottinfrance139347

Posts: 2,311

January 2012

Warrington Dan

Posts: 8,858

January 2012 not those dafttwats again. Those c*nts just f*ck the club up (even more so) for their own personal gain. They can all go andfuck themselves 

sambo applecart

Posts: 24,143

January 2012

tickets11 said:

http://www.sos1878.co.uk/everton-news/blue-union-strategy-meeting-live/?

Live updates starts at 7pm

-----------------

HOWIE8

Posts: 7,477

January 2012 Heard a rumour there is a march on the CASA organised, and a protest outside led by BK, RE, SHARPY, NEVILLE , CAHILL and a CLOWN.....just a rumour though.....

1ceablue

Posts: 3,253

January 2012 Do you support The Blue Union?

Yes (64%, 145 Votes)
No (36%, 83 Votes)
Total Voters: 228

Vote

This is the latest vote count on that website. Not a large following.............

OldGoldenVision

Posts: 19,472

January 2012 I would rather we didnt air our dirty laundry in public. hasnt helped us has it? Once that interview with bk came out the bank was all over us. As for deserving everything that comes their way, i agree, but not at the expense of the club...

Kim Jong-il

Posts: 989

January 2012

OldGoldenVision said:

I would rather we didnt air our dirty laundry in public. hasnt helped us has it? Once that interview with bk came out the bank was all over us. As for deserving everything that comes their way, i agree, but not at the expense of the club...

-----------------

You really believe this? Kin ell Will I'd have you down as being an intelligent lad and not fall for anit-BU propaganda. Do you really not think Barclays didn't already know what state the club are in? Yer know with them being the clubs bank?

OldGoldenVision

Posts: 19,472

January 2012

OldGoldenVision said:

I would rather we didnt air our dirty laundry in public. hasnt helped us has it? Once that interview with bk came out the bank was all over us. As for deserving everything that comes their way, i agree, but not at the expense of the club...

-----------------

You really believe this? Kin ell Will I'd have you down as being an intelligent lad and not fall for anit-BU propaganda. Do you really not think Barclays didn't already know what state the club are in? Yer know with them being the clubs bank?

-----------------

Up and down this country, behind closed doors, executives talk to bankers on a daily basis and there is a fine balance between continuing to trade and the plug being pulled.  As long as the real picture is kept behind closed doors and the bankers and executives play the game they continue to do business.  However, if those conversations became public knowledge the bankers would be forced to pull the plug because their risk management team would come down on them like a tonne of bricks.  I don't doubt that Barclays knew the position or knew within reason what the position was/is, however when BK was on record in the public domain admitting that he blags the bank on a daily basis the bank would have had no choice but to jump on the club, so no the BU releasing that transcript didn't help

Kim Jong-il

Posts: 989

January 2012

OldGoldenVision said:

OldGoldenVision said:

I would rather we didnt air our dirty laundry in public. hasnt helped us has it? Once that interview with bk came out the bank was all over us. As for deserving everything that comes their way, i agree, but not at the expense of the club...

-----------------

You really believe this? Kin ell Will I'd have you down as being an intelligent lad and not fall for anit-BU propaganda. Do you really not think Barclays didn't already know what state the club are in? Yer know with them being the clubs bank?

-----------------

Up and down this country, behind closed doors, executives talk to bankers on a daily basis and there is a fine balance between continuing to trade and the plug being pulled.  As long as the real picture is kept behind closed doors and the bankers and executives play the game they continue to do business.  However, if those conversations became public knowledge the bankers would be forced to pull the plug because their risk management team would come down on them like a tonne of bricks.  I don't doubt that Barclays knew the position or knew within reason what the position was/is, however when BK was on record in the public domain admitting that he blags the bank on a daily basis the bank would have had no choice but to jump on the club, so no the BU releasing that transcript didn't help

As for anti BU propaganda... at the end of the day the BU lied about wanting BK and the board out. They came up with a statement that they were opposed to stagnation and would work with the board to achieve the best result for the club.  If they had just had the courage of their convictions to stand up and say in public that they wanted BK out... fair enough. But they didnt.

-----------------

You're just speculating for all you know without the verbatim account of Bill's ramblings the bank were already knocking. The accusation is mud slinging by the anit-Blue Union Blue Bill bumming happy clappers. The anti brigade are just as gay and pathetic as the BU.

Kim Jong-il

Posts: 989

January 2012

deso1957bc said:

OldGoldenVision said:

OldGoldenVision said:

I would rather we didnt air our dirty laundry in public. hasnt helped us has it? Once that interview with bk came out the bank was all over us. As for deserving everything that comes their way, i agree, but not at the expense of the club...

-----------------

You really believe this? Kin ell Will I'd have you down as being an intelligent lad and not fall for anit-BU propaganda. Do you really not think Barclays didn't already know what state the club are in? Yer know with them being the clubs bank?

-----------------

Up and down this country, behind closed doors, executives talk to bankers on a daily basis and there is a fine balance between continuing to trade and the plug being pulled.  As long as the real picture is kept behind closed doors and the bankers and executives play the game they continue to do business.  However, if those conversations became public knowledge the bankers would be forced to pull the plug because their risk management team would come down on them like a tonne of bricks.  I don't doubt that Barclays knew the position or knew within reason what the position was/is, however when BK was on record in the public domain admitting that he blags the bank on a daily basis the bank would have had no choice but to jump on the club, so no the BU releasing that transcript didn't help

As for anti BU propaganda... at the end of the day the BU lied about wanting BK and the board out. They came up with a statement that they were opposed to stagnation and would work with the board to achieve the best result for the club.  If they had just had the courage of their convictions to stand up and say in public that they wanted BK out... fair enough. But they didnt.

-----------------

You're just speculating for all you know without the verbatim account of Bill's ramblings the bank were already knocking. The accusation is mud slinging by the anit-Blue Union Blue Bill bumming happy clappers. The anti brigade are just as gay and pathetic as the BU.

-----------------

Forgive me OGV...but are you saying that in the risk business of the football/commercial world we live in ..that Everton's perilous position was not recognised until a few supporters..BU..asked him a couple of questions which he.. BK.. could not/would not answer? and subsequently blamed BU for his gaffes?

-----------------

Exactly, it just shows how well oiled the Kenwright PR machine is its about the only thing he's mastered damage limitation the fat ponce