The views below are submitted by registered users of evertonfc.com and do not necessarily reflect the views of Everton Football Club. View the Blueroom acceptable usage policy.

Stop selling players, if we only can get loans in return.
  • since 1978
    Posts: 126
    If we continue on this road.
    In 2-3 years, we only have loan players.
    Who we gonna sell then, Mr Moyes?

  • ToffeeCup
    Posts: 2,955

    Great post..... I simply dread to think where Moyes might have taken this club had you not pointed this out!
  • kingmoyes
    Posts: 1,841
    ToffeeCup said:


    Great post..... I simply dread to think where Moyes might have taken this club had you not pointed this out!


    -----------------



    Agree!  Great read, fantastic point...


  • sambo applecart
    Posts: 24,142
    Its impossible b'cos every club is restricted to either 4 or 5 players loaned at any on time, so i doubt this will ever happen. ALthough, Moyes might not realize this so maybe somebody could tell him?? 
  • ToffeeCup
    Posts: 2,955

    We blood youngsters....good youngsters know this. As Barkley says 'the good thing about Everton is that they give good young kids a chance to prove themselves'...

    As a result we seem to be having two or three top prospects coming through ever three seasons or so......we also sign the odd promising young player too....and as sambo points out there is a limit to the number of loan players you can have at any one time.

    We also don't sell a major player all that often either.

    So on reflection, your point is pretty pointless.
  • Knoxy2001e
    Posts: 1,423
    "We also don't sell a major player all that often either. "

    while thats true it was a huge mistake to sell the yak. i reckon most fans didnt like that decision. and becks. altho he is no alan shearer he was our top scorer and he made an important contribution to the team.

    bk obviously leaves all these decisions to moysey, but he should at least make himself heard when decisions like that are being made.
  • IhateRS
    Posts: 1,091
    Yak was awful for us, I am happy we sold him, yes he would of played well in a formation of every one forward, everyone back like Balckburn have been playing but we don't play like that so selling him was a good decision.
    Also if we didn't sell, we couldn't even get loans in.
    Becks.. agree with.
    Yak however is the only one we sold through choice in a long time, most throw in transfer requests or refsue to sign new contracts.
  • tickets11
    Posts: 1,002
    IhateRS said:

    Yak was awful for us, I am happy we sold him, yes he would of played well in a formation of every one forward, everyone back like Balckburn have been playing but we don't play like that so selling him was a good decision.
    Also if we didn't sell, we couldn't even get loans in.
    Becks.. agree with.
    Yak however is the only one we sold through choice in a long time, most throw in transfer requests or refsue to sign new contracts.


    -----------------



    you serious, if this was the other way round and moyes had just brought in a striker for 1.5m that had scored 9 goals in 10 games there would of been threads on here saying how much of a legend moyes is, and how he has done it yet again.

    Its moyes responsibility to get the best out of his players and to keep them motivated, at times it was disgusting the way he was treated even made to play in the reserves at times.

    He was sent to leicester to regain fitness and form, he scored 11 goals in 20 games, he deserved another chance after that but was sold, probably one of the worst deals moyes has ever done.


    as you say Ihaters, we all know how to get the best out of yakubu, so why not play that way then.  playing defensive football we have already ost 8 games and are not half way through the season, we only lost 10 games through the whole of last season.

  • sambo applecart
    Posts: 24,142
    tickets11 said:

    IhateRS said:

    Yak was awful for us, I am happy we sold him, yes he would of played well in a formation of every one forward, everyone back like Balckburn have been playing but we don't play like that so selling him was a good decision.
    Also if we didn't sell, we couldn't even get loans in.
    Becks.. agree with.
    Yak however is the only one we sold through choice in a long time, most throw in transfer requests or refsue to sign new contracts.


    -----------------



    you serious, if this was the other way round and moyes had just brought in a striker for 1.5m that had scored 9 goals in 10 games there would of been threads on here saying how much of a legend moyes is, and how he has done it yet again.

    Its moyes responsibility to get the best out of his players and to keep them motivated, at times it was disgusting the way he was treated even made to play in the reserves at times.

    He was sent to leicester to regain fitness and form, he scored 11 goals in 20 games, he deserved another chance after that but was sold, probably one of the worst deals moyes has ever done.


    as you say Ihaters, we all know how to get the best out of yakubu, so why not play that way then.  playing defensive football we have already ost 8 games and are not half way through the season, we only lost 10 games through the whole of last season.


    -----------------




    I think the yak made it clear he didnt really want to be here mate tbh??
  • tickets11
    Posts: 1,002

    that because moyes never played him and treated him like ****.

    moyes even said himself it wil take him a season to recover fully from his injury but sold him anyway and  brought in straq, who must be even worse then the yak, i mean how many minutes has he played

  • sambo applecart
    Posts: 24,142
    tickets11 said:

    that because moyes never played him and treated him like ****.

    moyes even said himself it wil take him a season to recover fully from his injury but sold him anyway and  brought in straq, who must be even worse then the yak, i mean how many minutes has he played


    -----------------




    22?? haha, not many! he will go back to argie land in jan imo.........!
  • koolhandluke8
    Posts: 2,989
    gotta agree with the ticket man on this !!

    PS the original post is tosh !! IMO
  • IhateRS
    Posts: 1,091
    tickets11 said:

    IhateRS said:

    Yak was awful for us, I am happy we sold him, yes he would of played well in a formation of every one forward, everyone back like Balckburn have been playing but we don't play like that so selling him was a good decision.
    Also if we didn't sell, we couldn't even get loans in.
    Becks.. agree with.
    Yak however is the only one we sold through choice in a long time, most throw in transfer requests or refsue to sign new contracts.


    -----------------



    you serious, if this was the other way round and moyes had just brought in a striker for 1.5m that had scored 9 goals in 10 games there would of been threads on here saying how much of a legend moyes is, and how he has done it yet again.

    Its moyes responsibility to get the best out of his players and to keep them motivated, at times it was disgusting the way he was treated even made to play in the reserves at times.

    He was sent to leicester to regain fitness and form, he scored 11 goals in 20 games, he deserved another chance after that but was sold, probably one of the worst deals moyes has ever done.


    as you say Ihaters, we all know how to get the best out of yakubu, so why not play that way then.  playing defensive football we have already ost 8 games and are not half way through the season, we only lost 10 games through the whole of last season.


    -----------------



    Because they will finish below us as they always do, Yak would do well at Blackpool as well, as would any striker... Blackpool and Blackburn however do not do well as a team.. I would rather the team did okay than a specific player.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Poll

No poll attached to this discussion.

In this Discussion