The views below are submitted by registered users of evertonfc.com and do not necessarily reflect the views of Everton Football Club. View the Blueroom acceptable usage policy.

Congratulations David Cameron
  • escla
    Posts: 2,558
    Job well done into the early hours of this morning ! No concessions whatsoever to Europe , no further loss of sovereignty in addition to that which was surrendered by Blair / Brown and not a suggestion of our increasing contributions to Europe, pity that Blair was incapable of retaining the massive discounts negotiated by the Thatcher government, I rather suspect that there was " something in it for him " to hand them back.! The City of London and it's financial institutions have been spared the ridiculous " transaction tax" which he was being hard pressed to introduce so all in all an excellent nights work, well done DC ! The nation should be thankful !
  • fizzbomb
    Posts: 1,291
    Shurrup Ucunt!
  • escla
    Posts: 2,558
    fizzbomb said:

    Shurrup Ucunt!


    -----------------




    What an incredibly ignorant response, daresay it reflects your level of education and upbringing.
  • fizzbomb
    Posts: 1,291
    escla said:

    fizzbomb said:

    Shurrup Ucunt!


    -----------------




    What an incredibly ignorant response, daresay it reflects your level of education and upbringing.

    You can say what you want, but at the end of the day you're acunt.
  • ToffeeCup
    Posts: 3,160

    In all fairness to Germany and France... they knew they were never going to get any agreement out of all the european nations and Great Britian is the major player of all the non euro countries.

    Hence, the quickest way to get the situation sorted out was for them to go straight at the city of London and force Cameron to predicably spit his dummy leaving the euro nations to sort out their own mess.

    You can hardly blame them though as time is of the essense here. And its not like Cameron hasn't made our objections clear on the city of london leading up to this point.



    The outcome though is exactly what German and France want...to be able to close the door to the rest of the world tie Greece, Italy, Spain, Ireland and Portugal over a barrel and violently sodomise them for every euro of bail out cash they need...or perhaps more likely every million euro of debt that will need voiding.




    Still, when all is said and done.... there are nations that haven't operated in a sensible manner and there are those nations who looked the other way for the sake of their own interests....and now the lot of them can sort out what they've brought on themselves.

    But to think that David Cameron has done something other than have his strings pulled to an obvious end that largely pleases Germany is something only a tory tinted halfwitt would believe.


  • escla
    Posts: 2,558
    Of course I can say what I want, I always do , again you display your poor standard of education, unable to articulate an argument by expressing clarity of thought beyond the use of abusive language.
  • AndyForsyth
    Posts: 2,549
    Completely the wrong message to send out by Cameron, saying that a deal is not in the UK's best interests, of course it is! It can only be good for ties with EU countries, be good for business deals with other EU countries, trading, farming and will only make the UK stronger also as a country. In the long run, Britain will suffer because of this poor decision.
  • escla
    Posts: 2,558
    ToffeeCup said:


    In all fairness to Germany and France... they knew they were never going to get any agreement out of all the european nations and Great Britian is the major player of all the non euro countries.

    Hence, the quickest way to get the situation sorted out was for them to go straight at the city of London and force Cameron to predicably spit his dummy leaving the euro nations to sort out their own mess.

    You can hardly blame them though as time is of the essense here. And its not like Cameron hasn't made our objections clear on the city of london leading up to this point.



    The outcome though is exactly what German and France want...to be able to close the door to the rest of the world tie Greece, Italy, Spain, Ireland and Portugal over a barrel and violently sodomise them for every euro of bail out cash they need...or perhaps more likely every million euro of debt that will need voiding.




    Still, when all is said and done.... there are nations that haven't operated in a sensible manner and there are those nations who looked the other way for the sake of their own interests....and now the lot of them can sort out what they've brought on themselves.

    But to think that David Cameron has done something other than have his strings pulled to an obvious end that largely pleases Germany is something only a tory tinted halfwitt would believe.



    -----------------




    ToffeeCup said:


    In all fairness to Germany and France... they knew they were never going to get any agreement out of all the european nations and Great Britian is the major player of all the non euro countries.

    Hence, the quickest way to get the situation sorted out was for them to go straight at the city of London and force Cameron to predicably spit his dummy leaving the euro nations to sort out their own mess.

    You can hardly blame them though as time is of the essense here. And its not like Cameron hasn't made our objections clear on the city of london leading up to this point.



    The outcome though is exactly what German and France want...to be able to close the door to the rest of the world tie Greece, Italy, Spain, Ireland and Portugal over a barrel and violently sodomise them for every euro of bail out cash they need...or perhaps more likely every million euro of debt that will need voiding.




    Still, when all is said and done.... there are nations that haven't operated in a sensible manner and there are those nations who looked the other way for the sake of their own interests....and now the lot of them can sort out what they've brought on themselves.

    But to think that David Cameron has done something other than have his strings pulled to an obvious end that largely pleases Germany is something only a tory tinted halfwitt would believe.



    -----------------





    Quite an insightful analysis of events, parts of which I would agree with you on, particularly that the "Merkozy" coalition will now have free reign to bully G.I.S.I.P. without GB intervention.Do not agree however that Cameron has had his strings pulled in any way whatsoever, clearly our veto is causing France/Germany considerable discomfort , and rightly so.
  • ToffeeCup
    Posts: 3,160

    Completely the wrong message to send out by Cameron, saying that a deal is not in the UK's best interests, of course it is! It can only be good for ties with EU countries, be good for business deals with other EU countries, trading, farming and will only make the UK stronger also as a country. In the long run, Britain will suffer because of this poor decision.


    -----------------



    Not sure I'd agree with that Andy. At the end of the day Gordon Brown knew ther euro zone was going to be a very painful thing to implement and set 5 criteria for the UK to meet in order for us to join. They we select to ensure that we didn't join. And whatever you think about Gordon Brown he's been proved right on this point, even if he was a burk to sell off all that gold.

    But the point is our banks and the city of london does have a debt to pay and it needs to get its **** kicked in a fairly severe manner going forward. But its the people of the UK who bailed out their banks that should be repaid by them.... not greeks, Italians or any other euorpean needy cause that is suffering at its own hand.

    We are part of ~Europe and nothing with change that....but this is their mess, we elected not to get involved when we did and that decision has proved to be correct, we should get the benifit of that decision.

  • escla
    Posts: 2,558

    Completely the wrong message to send out by Cameron, saying that a deal is not in the UK's best interests, of course it is! It can only be good for ties with EU countries, be good for business deals with other EU countries, trading, farming and will only make the UK stronger also as a country. In the long run, Britain will suffer because of this poor decision.


    -----------------





    Oh dear oh dear Andy, don't get me started, we were getting on so nicely so I will just refrain from comment.
  • fizzbomb
    Posts: 1,291
    escla said:

    Of course I can say what I want, I always do , again you display your poor standard of education, unable to articulate an argument by expressing clarity of thought beyond the use of abusive language.


    So because my opinion of you is not to your satisfaction, i'm uneducated?

    How arrogant is that?

    Proves to me you really are acunt!
  • ToffeeCup
    Posts: 3,160
    escla said:

    ToffeeCup said:


    In all fairness to Germany and France... they knew they were never going to get any agreement out of all the european nations and Great Britian is the major player of all the non euro countries.

    Hence, the quickest way to get the situation sorted out was for them to go straight at the city of London and force Cameron to predicably spit his dummy leaving the euro nations to sort out their own mess.

    You can hardly blame them though as time is of the essense here. And its not like Cameron hasn't made our objections clear on the city of london leading up to this point.



    The outcome though is exactly what German and France want...to be able to close the door to the rest of the world tie Greece, Italy, Spain, Ireland and Portugal over a barrel and violently sodomise them for every euro of bail out cash they need...or perhaps more likely every million euro of debt that will need voiding.




    Still, when all is said and done.... there are nations that haven't operated in a sensible manner and there are those nations who looked the other way for the sake of their own interests....and now the lot of them can sort out what they've brought on themselves.

    But to think that David Cameron has done something other than have his strings pulled to an obvious end that largely pleases Germany is something only a tory tinted halfwitt would believe.



    -----------------




    ToffeeCup said:


    In all fairness to Germany and France... they knew they were never going to get any agreement out of all the european nations and Great Britian is the major player of all the non euro countries.

    Hence, the quickest way to get the situation sorted out was for them to go straight at the city of London and force Cameron to predicably spit his dummy leaving the euro nations to sort out their own mess.

    You can hardly blame them though as time is of the essense here. And its not like Cameron hasn't made our objections clear on the city of london leading up to this point.



    The outcome though is exactly what German and France want...to be able to close the door to the rest of the world tie Greece, Italy, Spain, Ireland and Portugal over a barrel and violently sodomise them for every euro of bail out cash they need...or perhaps more likely every million euro of debt that will need voiding.




    Still, when all is said and done.... there are nations that haven't operated in a sensible manner and there are those nations who looked the other way for the sake of their own interests....and now the lot of them can sort out what they've brought on themselves.

    But to think that David Cameron has done something other than have his strings pulled to an obvious end that largely pleases Germany is something only a tory tinted halfwitt would believe.



    -----------------





    Quite an insightful analysis of events, parts of which I would agree with you on, particularly that the "Merkozy" coalition will now have free reign to bully G.I.S.I.P. without GB intervention.Do not agree however that Cameron has had his strings pulled in any way whatsoever, clearly our veto is causing France/Germany considerable discomfort , and rightly so.

    -----------------




    Whilst it can be argued that it will cause Germany and France more
    economically than had the other european countires supported a
    solution... reality is that that option wasn't ever going to come to
    fruition in time.

    But both France and Germany understand that they were never going to get an actionable concensus out of that many counties in time to sort out te euro mess. The quickest way forward for them was to eject every non euro zone member from the discussion and the eaisest way to do that was to get Britian to spit its dummy.

    Day 1, job done.




    So now, Germany and France will be left to get medievil of the collective arses of anyone and everyone using the euro who can't meet their commitments.

    Its going to be horrible...but lets look at things from a positive light. Britian can now focus on a recovery fueled by an assult on the banking industry and the City of London. And Germany, via the euro, and armed with a subservient France will establish supremacy over most of europe without actually having to go to war.

  • escla
    Posts: 2,558
    It's not your opinion that I object to at all, it's the manner in which you express it that suggests that you are poorly educated.
  • 2dogs
    Posts: 109

    There are only three strands of opinion in this country who have any great love of the EU:

    1. The ruling elite - a cabal of senior politicians and diplomats who claim to be worried about our "loss of influence," although quite frankly why we should be concerned about meddling in the internal affairs of other European states (which is what the EU is ultimately for,) any more than we should lie awake at night fretting over our inability to determine employment law in Australia, or legislate to improve working conditions in Chinese coal mines, is quite beyond me. The whole influence thing might better be described as "Attending to the everyday needs of running a medium-sized European state isn't good enough for us, we want to be able to prance around at international conferences. And pretend that we're more important than we really are. And go to lots of fancy dinners." Pathetic.

    2. The Eurotopians - those hardcore Europhiles who are desperate to dissolve the country and turn it into a collection of little provinces under the tutelage of Brussels. These tend to be the sort of people who criticise any attempt by the British Government to stand up for its own position as "little Englanderism", and view the EU as the great bastion of western civilization - by which they mean, a juggernaut which can roll over national opposition, in order to impose a statist social model on everybody. Basically, a regime of cradle-to-grave handouts, the 35-hour working week and retirement at 55 - a sort of Greek-style, social democrat dream world. The fact that the EU is fundamentally anti-democratic, or that the British population would be unlikely ever to support the continuation of such a policy in the long term, is beside the point. 

    3. The defeatists - cue a wave of tedious moaning about how Britain doesn't have an empire anymore, and how we have to incorporate ourselves into the EU if we want to have any "influence" (that word again) in the world... Firstly, good riddance to imperialism. Secondly, if "influence" means doing what the Frankfurt Group command then I'd rather be irrelevant instead, thank you very much. Thirdly, being a sovereign state rather than an appendage of a bureaucratic confederation doesn't seem to have done any harm to the economies of the US, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland, Norway, Singapore, the BRICs, and half-a-hundred other places.

  • fizzbomb
    Posts: 1,291
    escla said:

    It's not your opinion that I object to at all, it's the manner in which you express it that suggests that you are poorly educated.


    I will admit i'm not the most educated person in the world, but I do have A levels so proved to myself i can pass exams if I apply myself. Nevertheless I feel my description of you has you down to a 't'.Just as the word may seem vulgar to you, it seems perfectly reasonable for me to describe you in such a fashion. Will chat more later, gorra go an' put the 'backbone' into Britain.
  • AndyForsyth
    Posts: 2,549
    Surely though, as with any situation, the more people that pitch in to help out, the quicker the situation gets sorted, and with more ease too?

    And if the UK were to join the Euro, surely it makes it easier for business deals and trading between EU countries to be done?

    I get what you mean when you say the UK people should be repaid by the UK banks because the UK people bailed them out, I get it (sound like Ed there don't I? No, maybe not) and that makes sense in this case but I still think that we should be forging links with the EU and joining the Euro because in the long run, it will only strengthen the UK in other cases.

    And, not that this is relevant, but I was one of a minority who was pro-Gordon Brown. Never understood the hatred for him. A lot more trustworthy than Blair.
  • escla
    Posts: 2,558
    Agree that it will indeed get horrible for those poor wretches in GISIP, perhaps the average salary for a Greek train driver will now be reduced from Euros 65k p.a. To 50 k ! but the German electorate, already pretty hot under the collar are going to make toast of Merkel
    and Sarkozy is dead man walking anyway after this, you are right, we can now focus on recovery.
  • ToffeeCup
    Posts: 3,160

    Surely though, as with any situation, the more people that pitch in to help out, the quicker the situation gets sorted, and with more ease too?


    And if the UK were to join the Euro, surely it makes it easier for business deals and trading between EU countries to be done?

    I get what you mean when you say the UK people should be repaid by the UK banks because the UK people bailed them out, I get it (sound like Ed there don't I? No, maybe not) and that makes sense in this case but I still think that we should be forging links with the EU and joining the Euro because in the long run, it will only strengthen the UK in other cases.

    And, not that this is relevant, but I was one of a minority who was pro-Gordon Brown. Never understood the hatred for him. A lot more trustworthy than Blair.

    -----------------





    Me too.... Content over style.

    The thing is though Andy...on Europe, there has to be a huge readjustment for the countries involved and huge redistribution of wealth for it to work for the UK.

    That isn't happening and for us, empire or no empire, that would just involved too much pain for our country. We are worth more to Europe by not having the euro... as when the euro gets into trouble, those nations benifit from and a wealthy UK market and a strong pound to buy their goods at a good exchange rate.
  • escla
    Posts: 2,558

    Surely though, as with any situation, the more people that pitch in to help out, the quicker the situation gets sorted, and with more ease too?


    And if the UK were to join the Euro, surely it makes it easier for business deals and trading between EU countries to be done?

    I get what you mean when you say the UK people should be repaid by the UK banks because the UK people bailed them out, I get it (sound like Ed there don't I? No, maybe not) and that makes sense in this case but I still think that we should be forging links with the EU and joining the Euro because in the long run, it will only strengthen the UK in other cases.

    And, not that this is relevant, but I was one of a minority who was pro-Gordon Brown. Never understood the hatred for him. A lot more trustworthy than Blair.

    -----------------





    Andy, - pouring good money that we don't have after bad with no hope of recovering it doesn't make any sense, trading in a different currency makes no difference whatsoever, we have global trading partners in numerous currencies. Yes, the banks should repay us first, finally, the one thing that all parties are in agreement on, including Gordon Brown , is that we should NOT join the Euro ! Seems you're on your own on that one. :)
  • ToffeeCup
    Posts: 3,160

    What I find truely alarming here is the methods of exerting dominace over a fellow country on our planet.....weapons of choice:

    Warfare and the mass slaughter of civilians

    The mis-selling of financial instruments




    The sooner presonal bank accounts are a public service and open to all the better. The banking industry should be purely Government and B2B only. The banks have proven themselves to be untrustworthy in every element of thier relationship with the public.
  • AndyForsyth
    Posts: 2,549
    escla said:

    Surely though, as with any situation, the more people that pitch in to help out, the quicker the situation gets sorted, and with more ease too?


    And if the UK were to join the Euro, surely it makes it easier for business deals and trading between EU countries to be done?

    I get what you mean when you say the UK people should be repaid by the UK banks because the UK people bailed them out, I get it (sound like Ed there don't I? No, maybe not) and that makes sense in this case but I still think that we should be forging links with the EU and joining the Euro because in the long run, it will only strengthen the UK in other cases.

    And, not that this is relevant, but I was one of a minority who was pro-Gordon Brown. Never understood the hatred for him. A lot more trustworthy than Blair.

    -----------------





    Andy, - pouring good money that we don't have after bad with no hope of recovering it doesn't make any sense, trading in a different currency makes no difference whatsoever, we have global trading partners in numerous currencies. Yes, the banks should repay us first, finally, the one thing that all parties are in agreement on, including Gordon Brown , is that we should NOT join the Euro ! Seems you're on your own on that one. :)

    -----------------



    See, now why couldn't you have responded to me like this in the past? The smiley face wasn't even necessary here because I didn't sense an aggressive tone in the post. I still disagree with you, which is fine I'm sure you'll agree as nobody is expected to have the same opinion all the time, but this is the kind of response I can accept because it doesn't come across in an agressive fashion.

    TC, I understand that in some ways I suppose that those who have the Euro do gain from us in terms of the exchange rate, but a fairer thing would be for us all to gain from having the same exchange, and I still think it would be a whole lot easier and transactions would be done quicker too.

    As Escla says, I'm in a very small minority if not on my own on this.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Poll

No poll attached to this discussion.

In this Discussion