The views below are submitted by registered users of evertonfc.com and do not necessarily reflect the views of Everton Football Club. View the Blueroom acceptable usage policy.

We need
  • milky71
    Posts: 8,706
    Lampard isn't great skillfully but does the easy things well.

    Not sure Jack has the tenacity to be a DM something that will always hinder Felli in that role.

    I'm sure you'll agree that tackling isn't Felli's strong point.
  • mattyod
    Posts: 305
    No Felliani is clumbsy but he does break the play up and positionally gets it right.

    With Jack I think he covers the ground well and feel he is more Viera than Lampard but do see what your saying. My comment of not missing him was purely because I do not think he could of unlocked the defence. I do think though we are going to need to change our formation to accomodate both him and Felliani. For me that would mean having a creative player (Barkley) in there as well with the wide men pushing further forward.

    If you played him yesterday who would you of replaced.
  • milky71
    Posts: 8,706
    I would have replaced him with Cahill.

    But then i would have also played Barklay instead of Osman.
  • mattyod
    Posts: 305
    Cahill wasn't great but I would have rather seen Vellios, Gueye or even Billy because I think they would have a better chance than Jack. But agree that it would be good to see a middle 3 of Jack Felliani and Barkley.

    Also my point was of that game particular and that we looked very solid just needed spark therefore we didn't miss Jack but more Barkley if he can offer that spark.
Add a Comment

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Forum

Poll

No poll attached to this discussion.

In this Discussion