The views below are submitted by registered users of evertonfc.com and do not necessarily reflect the views of Everton Football Club. View the Blueroom acceptable usage policy.
-
-
-
Posts: 7,460August 2011escla said:
You not makin any sense, explain " i know you are, wha abar me " ?
Can't be a.rsed like... -
-
-
Posts: 172August 2011escla said:
Typical mob mentality here,one halfwit makes a totally fabricated post and then the rest of you pile in with such ridiculous comments such as " no surprise, the man's a **** head" ! The boy was given a probation order by the court, the irresponsible parent a £50 fine and that was the end of it before Manchester City Council LABOUR ffs ! Said they were considering evicting them ! Nothing whatsoever to do with Cameron or his party !
I said Cameron stand behind the possibility of evicting the boy`s family. He has made a public statement supporting such measures. Perhaps it would be better if he made sure people had jobs instead. Something meaningfull to do, and means to support themself would surely keep people from this sort of rioting. That would be bad for the elitists though. -
-
Posts: 1,091August 2011 I think these barbaric sentances handed out over the looting are just ludicrous, for me a softer rehabilitating approach would give far better results.
Something simple maybe along the lines of the looters being be shut in a room, in groups of 50, with a variety of weapons.. Last man standing earns his freedom, thegovernment can pay for the repairs to the shops by licencing it out to Sky and it deals with the problem of overcrowding with the prison system.
Just seems the civl way to treat these people.
ps if anyone is going to the next lot of riots, I just got a new 7.1 surround sound system and need a new subwoofer.
Just putting it out there like, if your passing a broken window by an electrical shop.. or even a completely unbroken window and accidentally fall in, or make a brick fall in, and the cable gets caught around your leg when you run off and find you've dragged a large speaker with you all the way down the street... you know, just saying.. I'll take it off your hands like.
You don't even have to thank me for it. -
Posts: 2,450August 2011jwollnick said:escla said:
Typical mob mentality here,one halfwit makes a totally fabricated post and then the rest of you pile in with such ridiculous comments such as " no surprise, the man's a **** head" ! The boy was given a probation order by the court, the irresponsible parent a £50 fine and that was the end of it before Manchester City Council LABOUR ffs ! Said they were considering evicting them ! Nothing whatsoever to do with Cameron or his party !
I said Cameron stand behind the possibility of evicting the boy`s family. He has made a public statement supporting such measures. Perhaps it would be better if he made sure people had jobs instead. Something meaningfull to do, and means to support themself would surely keep people from this sort of rioting. That would be bad for the elitists though.
So you are saying that Cameron stands behind the Labour politicians proposal to evict this family are you ? There is no evidence of that, I think you are lying.you are also saying that after 12months in office he should by now have cleaned up the 13 years of **** left behind by that halfwit Labour government ? Get real sunshine !
-
Posts: 172August 2011escla said:jwollnick said:escla said:
Typical mob mentality here,one halfwit makes a totally fabricated post and then the rest of you pile in with such ridiculous comments such as " no surprise, the man's a **** head" ! The boy was given a probation order by the court, the irresponsible parent a £50 fine and that was the end of it before Manchester City Council LABOUR ffs ! Said they were considering evicting them ! Nothing whatsoever to do with Cameron or his party !
I said Cameron stand behind the possibility of evicting the boy`s family. He has made a public statement supporting such measures. Perhaps it would be better if he made sure people had jobs instead. Something meaningfull to do, and means to support themself would surely keep people from this sort of rioting. That would be bad for the elitists though.
So you are saying that Cameron stands behind the Labour politicians proposal to evict this family are you ? There is no evidence of that, I think you are lying.you are also saying that after 12months in office he should by now have cleaned up the 13 years of **** left behind by that halfwit Labour government ? Get real sunshine !
Read so in an interview in a Norwegain newspaper. When the tough gets going, etc.. I was talking of an alternative reaction. Instead of fighting fire with fire, he could have acknowledged that there is a serious soicial problem behind things. Riots don`t happen out of the blue, you know. Perhaps it`s one of those tough leader, facade sh@ite hype.
This is not to be read as an justification of the riots. It`s just the same old story of politicians choosing the easy way out. The media will have new things to steal our attention in a month or so. Nothing will change to the better -
Posts: 172August 2011 Here. I used google translate, so the grammar is horrible(Norwenglish as they say).
http://www.lillestromby.no/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=9788:s%C3%B8nnen-18-deltok-i-oppt%C3%B8yene-n%C3%A5-mister-moren-leiligheten&Itemid=600
Cameron: - That they should be thought of before
Prime Minister David Cameron has previously expressed his support for the measure, which is intended to help put a stop to the ongoing riots that have spread all over England the past week.
- I think we have too long hart taken lightly on the attitudes of people who are looting their own communities. If you do, you should lose the right to subsidized housing, he said, according to The Guardian [9].
Poor social services is highlighted as one of the main causes of the riots that started in the wake of the murder of 29-year-old Mike Duggan at Tottenham [10] for almost a week ago.
The prime minister refused, however, that the draft projections will mean more poverty and worse conditions in already congested areas.
- Of course it will mean that they must live somewhere else, and that they must find housing in the private sector will be difficult for them. But what would they think of before they began to plunder, he said.
The district committees in Westminster, Greenwich, Hammersmith and Fulham, Nottingham and Salford considering evictions as punishment for the riots. -
Posts: 137August 2011 I there was a license for children this wouldn't happen. We have licenses for dogs, driving etc......It would stop teenagers giving birth to 5 kids they can't control. Furthermore it wouldn't drain the country so much if you could afford to have kids without recourse to public funds.
A parent should know what their kids are up to. If they don't they're overstretched or just don't give a F.
I may get flamed for this comment >:-) -
Posts: 7,460August 2011bluewookie said:
I there was a license for children this wouldn't happen. We have licenses for dogs, driving etc......It would stop teenagers giving birth to 5 kids they can't control. Furthermore it wouldn't drain the country so much if you could afford to have kids without recourse to public funds.
A parent should know what their kids are up to. If they don't they're overstretched or just don't give a F.
I may get flamed for this comment >:-)
I think that's terribly simplistic like... -
Posts: 0August 2011IdiAminDaDa said:bluewookie said:
I there was a license for children this wouldn't happen. We have licenses for dogs, driving etc......It would stop teenagers giving birth to 5 kids they can't control. Furthermore it wouldn't drain the country so much if you could afford to have kids without recourse to public funds.
A parent should know what their kids are up to. If they don't they're overstretched or just don't give a F.
I may get flamed for this comment >:-)
I think that's terribly simplistic like...
40 year olds with wookie in there name was never skids hey
-
Posts: 137August 2011scottdblue said:IdiAminDaDa said:bluewookie said:
I there was a license for children this wouldn't happen. We have licenses for dogs, driving etc......It would stop teenagers giving birth to 5 kids they can't control. Furthermore it wouldn't drain the country so much if you could afford to have kids without recourse to public funds.
A parent should know what their kids are up to. If they don't they're overstretched or just don't give a F.
I may get flamed for this comment >:-)
I think that's terribly simplistic like...
40 year olds with wookie in there name was never skids hey
eh? never skids? Oh, and i'm 33 %-(
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Forum
- All Discussions19,226
- Sport
- ↳ Everton Talk4,441
- ↳ Transfer rumours392
- ↳ General Sport471
- Non-Sport
- ↳ General Chat1,951
- ↳ Introductions36
- ↳ Competitions38
- Moderator Area
Poll
No poll attached to this discussion.In this Discussion
- [Deleted User] August 2011
- 1ceablue August 2011
- AndyForsyth August 2011
- BlueJayDee August 2011
- bluewookie August 2011
- deso1957bc August 2011
- escla August 2011
- IdiAminDaDa August 2011
- IhateRS August 2011
- jwollnick August 2011
- milky71 August 2011
- ScouseBlues August 2011
- Yobowannabe August 2011