The views below are submitted by registered users of evertonfc.com and do not necessarily reflect the views of Everton Football Club. View the Blueroom acceptable usage policy.

moyes
  • cjohno
    Posts: 5,181
    hes becoming a fooking liability , i dont give a toss if were playing citeh he gave us absolutely no chance of getting a result today , our best midfielder is a passenger upfront and we got a poor player in the centre in neville, leaves our most promising and talented player in the changing rooms in barkley ffs were only 5 games into the season and hes protecting him and he has a headless foooking chicken in coleman, we got no striking options? llooooooooooooooool moyes you got 3 strikers on the bench and have 2 midfielders upfront, sorry citeh wer ethere for the taking but your negative approach is killing our players, felli wont stay here with you as mananger, he dont look interested. i dont care how poor the ref was it was moyes's poor selection and tactics that cost us the game, it was inevitable the parking the bus would fail eventually, the defense was superb but you gave us know chance with your pisssssssssss poor tactics, ohhhhhhh it was citeh lets be scared and happy with losing 2-0
  • mrbluechief
    Posts: 133
    absolutely agree , coleman is poor against the better teams & no striker to start was like giving city a goal headstart knowing that we offered little threat going forward
  • IhateRS
    Posts: 1,091
    Every time we moved in slightly forward we got anhialated by an outstanding City team. If we had no defensive midfielder we would of lost by 6 or 7  today.. Unlucky on the first goal but as soon as we started attacking they started getting through with ease.
    Moyes approach was right today, we couldn't attack them, our team simply isn't that good to take on City and the linesman and the ref.

  • cjohno
    Posts: 5,181
    IhateRS said:

    Every time we moved in slightly forward we got anhialated by an outstanding City team. If we had no defensive midfielder we would of lost by 6 or 7  today.. Unlucky on the first goal but as soon as we started attacking they started getting through with ease.
    Moyes approach was right today, we couldn't attack them, our team simply isn't that good to take on City and the linesman and the ref.



    neville isnt a defensive midfielder our best one was upfront looooooooool moyes approach was to lose by a low score nothing else
  • Beano
    Posts: 3,298
    As soon as the team was changed to the way you wanted it, we looked worse than we did all game - Against a team who weren't even trying anymore!
  • jj1878
    Posts: 187
    IhateRS said:

    Every time we moved in slightly forward we got anhialated by an outstanding City team. If we had no defensive midfielder we would of lost by 6 or 7  today.. Unlucky on the first goal but as soon as we started attacking they started getting through with ease.
    Moyes approach was right today, we couldn't attack them, our team simply isn't that good to take on City and the linesman and the ref.


    -----------------

    Couldnt diagree more.  Whats the point in playing an iltra defensive 4-5 -1, when we know eventually Man C would break us down, woul much prefer to give it and go and try and win the game




  • scottdblue
    Posts: 264

    when has it ever worked playing cahill,i mean come on what is wrong with him
  • cjohno
    Posts: 5,181
    Beano said:

    As soon as the team was changed to the way you wanted it, we looked worse than we did all game - Against a team who weren't even trying anymore!



    he didnt change it untill we were losing as usual. then we had to chase the game mate, so obviously they would get more space, but to play neville in centre and felli upfront is a total joke mate.
  • scottdblue
    Posts: 264

    he might be making individuals happy playing players in whatever position they wanna play in but he`s setting the team back, which is not good management in my opinion. yeh ok switch it round but we have plenty of depth in the squad so we can change the players who arent playing well. position for position fs, non of this cahill upfront and neville i hate that jesus
  • IhateRS
    Posts: 1,091
    Maybe Cahill is better up front than our strikers.  We needed a couple of players who would work their butt off for however long they were on the pitch, who would battle 4 of the most expensive defenders and two of the most expensive defensive midfielders on the planet.. Cahill and Fellaini were likely to have more success than some kids or our glass man striker.
    We played a better team and lost, nothing to do with the personnel that were played, everything to do with not having a team that cost hundreds of millions.
    Lets face it we went 4-4-2 and all out attack and nearly scored which is great, we did however actually concede, if we had done that from the start we would of been destroyed.
  • scottdblue
    Posts: 264
    they are a good team hey, only real challengers of the league this year unless chelsea pull off a miracle
  • sambo applecart
    Posts: 24,216
    cjohno said:

    Beano said:

    As soon as the team was changed to the way you wanted it, we looked worse than we did all game - Against a team who weren't even trying anymore!



    he didnt change it untill we were losing     as usual. then we had to chase the game mate, so obviously they would get more space, but to play neville in centre and felli upfront is a total joke mate.




    whats the point in changing it when things are going to plan???
  • cjohno
    Posts: 5,181
    sambo applecart said:

    cjohno said:

    Beano said:

    As soon as the team was changed to the way you wanted it, we looked worse than we did all game - Against a team who weren't even trying anymore!



    he didnt change it untill we were losing     as usual. then we had to chase the game mate, so obviously they would get more space, but to play neville in centre and felli upfront is a total joke mate.




    whats the point in changing it when things are going to plan???
    going to plan neville couldnt put a tackle in the second half because he was booked, do you think the team would of been worse with felliani in the centre and saha upfront? you can improve your chances of getting a result with some good tactics and subs, but moyes stands there clueless untill hes forced to make changes, do you think the team would of been poorer with barkley on the right instead of coleman who offers absolutely **** all, soory poor selections and tactics the plan was to keep the score low and it succeeded.

  • IhateRS
    Posts: 1,091

    cjohno said:

    sambo applecart said:

    cjohno said:

    Beano said:

    As soon as the team was changed to the way you wanted it, we looked worse than we did all game - Against a team who weren't even trying anymore!



    he didnt change it untill we were losing     as usual. then we had to chase the game mate, so obviously they would get more space, but to play neville in centre and felli upfront is a total joke mate.




    whats the point in changing it when things are going to plan???
    going to plan neville couldnt put a tackle in the second half because he was booked, do you think the team would of been worse with felliani in the centre and saha upfront? you can improve your chances of getting a result with some good tactics and subs, but moyes stands there clueless untill hes forced to make changes, do you think the team would of been poorer with barkley on the right instead of coleman who offers absolutely **** all, soory poor selections and tactics the plan was to keep the score low and it succeeded.


    -----------------



    Yes, Saha wouldn't of got near to getting a touch.
  • sambo applecart
    Posts: 24,216
    cjohno said:

    sambo applecart said:

    cjohno said:

    Beano said:

    As soon as the team was changed to the way you wanted it, we looked worse than we did all game - Against a team who weren't even trying anymore!



    he didnt change it untill we were losing     as usual. then we had to chase the game mate, so obviously they would get more space, but to play neville in centre and felli upfront is a total joke mate.




    whats the point in changing it when things are going to plan???
    going to plan neville couldnt put a tackle in the second half because he was booked, do you think the team would of been worse with felliani in the centre and saha upfront? you can improve your chances of getting a result with some good tactics and subs, but moyes stands there clueless untill hes forced to make changes, do you think the team would of been poorer with barkley on the right instead of coleman who offers absolutely **** all, soory poor selections and tactics the plan was to keep the score low and it succeeded.






    LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL! i can tell your a bit annoyed from the game still mate, come and have a chat when you've chilled out about cos ive never heard such tripe tbh,
  • cjohno
    Posts: 5,181
    sambo applecart said:

    cjohno said:

    sambo applecart said:

    cjohno said:

    Beano said:

    As soon as the team was changed to the way you wanted it, we looked worse than we did all game - Against a team who weren't even trying anymore!



    he didnt change it untill we were losing     as usual. then we had to chase the game mate, so obviously they would get more space, but to play neville in centre and felli upfront is a total joke mate.




    whats the point in changing it when things are going to plan???
    going to plan neville couldnt put a tackle in the second half because he was booked, do you think the team would of been worse with felliani in the centre and saha upfront? you can improve your chances of getting a result with some good tactics and subs, but moyes stands there clueless untill hes forced to make changes, do you think the team would of been poorer with barkley on the right instead of coleman who offers absolutely **** all, soory poor selections and tactics the plan was to keep the score low and it succeeded.






    LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL! i can tell your a bit annoyed from the game still mate, come and have a chat when you've chilled out about cos ive never heard such tripe tbh,


    and ive never seen such tripe tactics if you think neville in centre instead of felli and felli upfront with 3 strikers on the bench is better tactically but to coin a phrase you need to give your head a wobble
  • sambo applecart
    Posts: 24,216
    so all through the game EVERY player stuck to there exact position did they?? didnt swap around and fill in gaps when people were getting tired running their socks off to close down the space and not give city much time on the ball?? 
  • Beano
    Posts: 3,298
    cjohno said:

    Beano said:

    As soon as the team was changed to the way you wanted it, we looked worse than we did all game - Against a team who weren't even trying anymore!



    he didnt change it untill we were losing as usual. then we had to chase the game mate, so obviously they would get more space, but to play neville in centre and felli upfront is a total joke mate.

    -----------------



    No. He put on a striker before Ballotelli scored. Pay attention!our response below this line">-----------------

    No. He put on a striker before Ballotelli scored. Pay attention!

  • cjohno
    Posts: 5,181
    Beano said:

    cjohno said:

    Beano said:

    As soon as the team was changed to the way you wanted it, we looked worse than we did all game - Against a team who weren't even trying anymore!



    he didnt change it untill we were losing as usual. then we had to chase the game mate, so obviously they would get more space, but to play neville in centre and felli upfront is a total joke mate.

    -----------------



    No. He put on a striker before Ballotelli scored. Pay attention!our response below this line">-----------------

    No. He put on a striker before Ballotelli scored. Pay attention!

    look at the end of the day if you think it was better tactically to play neville in centre and felli upfront and leave 3 strikers on the bench then good for you. i dont simple as

  • My boys blue
    Posts: 3
    Just read all the comments, dont think we where all watching the same game, and not one of you mentioned the ref, 2 fouls in the goal area not given, a load of yellow cards and yet Man city got one, even though they had more fouls against them on according to the performance board that was put up by sky sport, Everton where playing 12 men, and we know the managers cant say what they think about ref`s but you the supporters can, I have sent a e.mail to the Ref association, not just about this game but other teams i have watched where the Ref seems bias, So dont blaim Moyes for something that is out of his control
  • 11blue
    Posts: 4,681
    My boys blue said:

    Just read all the comments, dont think we where all watching the same game, and not one of you mentioned the ref, 2 fouls in the goal area not given, a load of yellow cards and yet Man city got one, even though they had more fouls against them on according to the performance board that was put up by sky sport, Everton where playing 12 men, and we know the managers cant say what they think about ref`s but you the supporters can, I have sent a e.mail to the Ref association, not just about this game but other teams i have watched where the Ref seems bias, So dont blaim Moyes for something that is out of his control


    -----------------



    Did you mean Man City where playing with 12 men!!
Add a Comment

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Forum

Poll

No poll attached to this discussion.

In this Discussion