The views below are submitted by registered users of evertonfc.com and do not necessarily reflect the views of Everton Football Club. View the Blueroom acceptable usage policy.

Do we play better without Fellaini?
  • Dick Van Dyke
    Posts: 739
    I know it's Oldham and I know we're at home, but are we playing better without the Big Fella?

    We pass it about more and create far more opportunities.


  • JoeIsuzu
    Posts: 154
    Yes, I think we do.
  • WantingToEnd-It
    Posts: 854
    we dont play better without him, we just play with a different style
  • guitargod17
    Posts: 101
    we'll find out next season now won't we?
  • Dick Van Dyke
    Posts: 739
    we dont play better without him, we just play with a different style

    -----------------



    Isn't this style better though? We're winning for once...


    we'll find out next season now won't we?


    -----------------



    £35m. New goalie, CB, CM and maybe a forward. I'd take that any day.
  • scouse48
    Posts: 609
    Sign Matt Smith,good target man.
  • Jay McD
    Posts: 1,206
    I don't think we have played that well, professional job is all.

    Credit to Oldham for not giving up

    Also I think we're better team with Fellaini
  • JoeIsuzu
    Posts: 154

    £35m. New goalie, CB, CM and maybe a forward. I'd take that any day.


    -----------------


    Absolutely.

  • murray1878
    Posts: 3,179
    dont think we played well at all tonight
  • WantingToEnd-It
    Posts: 854

    dont think we played well at all tonight


    -----------------



    played shittee again to be honest
  • Warrington Dan
    Posts: 8,869
    said it all season that I prefer him in centre mid
  • xreyuk123
    Posts: 793
    I think we play better without Fellaini behind Jelavic, but not without Fellaini altogether.
  • sambo applecart
    Posts: 24,753
    xreyuk123 said:

    I think we play better without Fellaini behind Jelavic, but not without Fellaini altogether.


    -----------------



    i agree mate, we lack creativity with fellaini behind the striker 
  • WantingToEnd-It
    Posts: 854

    null


    -----------------



    but he was so affective there till at least December/january mate
  • sambo applecart
    Posts: 24,753
    but he was so affective there till at least December/january mate

    -----------------



    i said it earlier in the season mate, a defensive midfielder playing off the striker? not for me that tbh....
  • NSNO
    Posts: 3,248
    Thought we played really poor tonight....osman & pienaar didn't get into it at all really, little of no creativity.....jelavic was fed scraps.....
    Will need to play much much better against Wigan...
  • Snowcone
    Posts: 7,542

    dont think we played well at all tonight


    -----------------



    F 'kin shut it Murray you ugly scotscunt! 67 years I've been a fan.
  • cjohno
    Posts: 5,468
    no we dont because we got that donkey neville in the centre , please plase please get fellaini in centre mid when hes fit and fooooooooooooooooooook off playing him behind jelavic put pienaar there or keep osman there pienaar was poor again and maybe moving him forward will help. or play mirallas behind jelavic. not a convincing performance but job done need to improve to progress
  • WantingToEnd-It
    Posts: 854

    i said it earlier in the season mate, a defensive midfielder playing off the striker? not for me that tbh....


    -----------------



    we need to find someone to play there then, or have we already got someone?
  • cjohno
    Posts: 5,468
    we need to find someone to play there then, or have we already got someone?

    -----------------



    just play 2 upfront mirallas and jelavic or play mirallas behind the striker
  • WantingToEnd-It
    Posts: 854
    cjohno said:

    just play 2 upfront mirallas and jelavic or play mirallas behind the striker


    -----------------



    yeah agreeed mate

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Poll

No poll attached to this discussion.

In this Discussion