The views below are submitted by registered users of evertonfc.com and do not necessarily reflect the views of Everton Football Club. View the Blueroom acceptable usage policy.

Naismith
  • sambo applecart
    Posts: 24,216
    interesting article mate, i dont disagree with it either tbh, but, this bit made me laugh, not the best analogy....

    'Say you were a nightclub owner and your regular barman (Kevin Mirallas) has broken his arm and will be unable to serve; if you stuck your bouncer there, would it be fair to expect him to execute his task to the highest quality?'
  • cjohno
    Posts: 5,174
    well most of us have said it hes not a wide midfielder, which brings me to ask how come a manager on big wages thinks he is ? i feel sorry for him really, give him a chance in behind jelavic and get fellaini back in the centre and be a little more solid defensively, fed up of felli upfront and sick of naismith being out wide, but nothing will change untill moyes finally goes. maybe then we will see some promise from players like naismith and maybe one or two of our youngsters may get a chance.
  • sambo applecart
    Posts: 24,216
    neither was arteta a wide midfielder but moyes played him there to get  him used to the pace of the premier league.......
  • cjohno
    Posts: 5,174

    null


    -----------------



    but arteta was at least a midfielder , naismith is a forward not a midfielder
  • sambo applecart
    Posts: 24,216
    cjohno said:

    but arteta was at least a midfielder , naismith is a forward not a midfielder


    -----------------



    you miss the point mate, he has done it with a few players, Wenge does the same....
  • cjohno
    Posts: 5,174
    im not missing the point naismith isnt even close to being a midfielder, did jelavic get put in midfield ? naismith cant tackle and does not have the pace to play out wide
  • sambo applecart
    Posts: 24,216
    cjohno said:

    im not missing the point naismith isnt even close to being a midfielder, did jelavic get put in midfield ? naismith cant tackle and does not have the pace to play out wide


    -----------------



    yeah cos Arteta was like lightening 
  • Winston Wolfe
    Posts: 4,674

    interesting article mate, i dont disagree with it either tbh, but, this bit made me laugh, not the best analogy....


    'Say you were a nightclub owner and your regular barman (Kevin Mirallas) has broken his arm and will be unable to serve; if you stuck your bouncer there, would it be fair to expect him to execute his task to the highest quality?'

    -----------------



    Lol....was funny like.

    Get what you are saying about getting players used to the Premier League, but does he need to do it for a full season.

    Does it mean we'll see Mirallas up front next season?
  • cjohno
    Posts: 5,174

    null


    -----------------



    arteta had skill and inteligence to go past a player, he had the ability of a midfielder to manage it, naismaith is a forward fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffssssssssssss like
  • sambo applecart
    Posts: 24,216
    quite possibly mate, but, it could be with Naismith Moyes doesnt fancy him behind the striker, BUT, why persist in playing him if he knows (and he will know) that he is not suited to playing out wide? Moyes usually has something up hos sleave, he hits a stale patch like every manager over the course of a season, but he finds a way to make it work....
  • sambo applecart
    Posts: 24,216
    cjohno said:

    arteta had skill and inteligence to go past a player, he had the ability of a midfielder to manage it, naismaith is a forward fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffssssssssssss like


    -----------------



    not when he first came, he was 'ok' not brilliant. he did a job, we bought him and he improved. 

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Poll

No poll attached to this discussion.

In this Discussion