The views below are submitted by registered users of evertonfc.com and do not necessarily reflect the views of Everton Football Club. View the Blueroom acceptable usage policy.

Hahnemann to join Everton
  • Beano
    Posts: 3,297

    Premiership mate! I think he's good enough to go elsewhere in the prem!



    Mucha? No Way!
    I've seen a good bit of him playing for Slovakia coz they're in the same group as us and I think he's 5hite!
  • Warrington Dan
    Posts: 8,859
    He looks like a g@y p0rn star!
  • HOWIE8
    Posts: 7,570

    what a slap in the face for Mucha. we all go on about the timing of transfers at the last minute. Now window is closed mucha cant go anywhere. I feel for the bloke. He should deffo move on and get first team action elsewhere. he`d be number one for a lot of teams in the championship or europe



    Seriously mate" a slap in th face" is what he needs, he's absoloutly ****......
  • kingmoyes
    Posts: 1,841
    Beano said:

    kingmoyes said:

    OUT OF ALL THE FREE AGENTS HE COULD HAVE



    Who?


    **** OFF BEANO YOU ****
  • zagan
    Posts: 4,706
    Not the best or most needed signing IMO......but there must be method behind the madness.....surely.....
  • sambo applecart
    Posts: 24,216
    im getting his name on the back of my shirt
  • 11blue
    Posts: 4,681
    He isn't a bad keeper, better than Mucha I think, and he's on a free so why not?
  • zagan
    Posts: 4,706
    11blue said:

    He isn't a bad keeper, better than Mucha I think, and he's on a free so why not?





    Question is, why not focus on positions we really need to be filled?

    Like I said though, there must be method to the madness....maybe...
  • kingmoyes
    Posts: 1,841
    zagan said:

    11blue said:

    He isn't a bad keeper, better than Mucha I think, and he's on a free so why not?





    Question is, why not focus on positions we really need to be filled?

    Like I said though, there must be method to the madness....maybe...


    Exactly..................... Dont need a **** UEFA Licence to figure that one out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
  • sambo applecart
    Posts: 24,216
    i think we might look at shipping mucha out in jan, so we get a free goalie and then get 500k-1million for mucha, makes sense??
  • 11blue
    Posts: 4,681
    zagan said:

    11blue said:

    He isn't a bad keeper, better than Mucha I think, and he's on a free so why not?





    Question is, why not focus on positions we really need to be filled?

    Like I said though, there must be method to the madness....maybe...


    But he's on a free so why not?
  • zagan
    Posts: 4,706
    Money is the only thing that makes sense now-days in footy.

    We'll see I guess.
    There must be a reason, and I'm sure all will be reviled at some point.
  • zagan
    Posts: 4,706
    11blue said:

    zagan said:

    11blue said:

    He isn't a bad keeper, better than Mucha I think, and he's on a free so why not?





    Question is, why not focus on positions we really need to be filled?

    Like I said though, there must be method to the madness....maybe...


    But he's on a free so why not?






    FFS, worra tit :p

    there is a question to every question.
    Mines better though :p
  • 11blue
    Posts: 4,681
    zagan said:

    11blue said:

    zagan said:

    11blue said:

    He isn't a bad keeper, better than Mucha I think, and he's on a free so why not?





    Question is, why not focus on positions we really need to be filled?

    Like I said though, there must be method to the madness....maybe...


    But he's on a free so why not?






    FFS, worra tit :p

    there is a question to every question.
    Mines better though :p


    I know I'm a tit but if he's on a free why not  :-D
  • zagan
    Posts: 4,706
    11blue said:

    zagan said:

    11blue said:

    zagan said:

    11blue said:

    He isn't a bad keeper, better than Mucha I think, and he's on a free so why not?





    Question is, why not focus on positions we really need to be filled?

    Like I said though, there must be method to the madness....maybe...


    But he's on a free so why not?






    FFS, worra tit :p

    there is a question to every question.
    Mines better though :p


    I know I'm a tit but if he's on a free why not  :-D




    Because its another persons wages for a position we don't need filled atm?
  • xreyuk123
    Posts: 785
    Waste of wages if you ask me.
  • 11blue
    Posts: 4,681
    zagan said:

    11blue said:

    zagan said:

    11blue said:

    zagan said:

    11blue said:

    He isn't a bad keeper, better than Mucha I think, and he's on a free so why not?





    Question is, why not focus on positions we really need to be filled?

    Like I said though, there must be method to the madness....maybe...


    But he's on a free so why not?






    FFS, worra tit :p

    there is a question to every question.
    Mines better though :p


    I know I'm a tit but if he's on a free why not  :-D




    Because its another persons wages for a position we don't need filled atm?


    He's not going to be on megabucks is he? Maybe he even took a cut in his wages to come here, who knows. He has only came as cover and we do only have two keepers, so we could do with another one. He is only here to January so he might not play for us, but if he does good luck to him. 
  • lorrhapimp
    Posts: 307
    Spot on 11blue.
    Anyone see him on Soccer Saturday at the start of the season? Basically selling himself on tv because he had no club to go to. Howard more than likely had an influence too. No harm at all.
  • AllAroundMyHat
    Posts: 776
    well the only thing i like about the whole deal is that he said in his interview that the talks took a realy long time (im paraphrasing). im gonna take this as we were trying to get him really cheap coz he and EFC both knew he had no where else to go. If he`s on more than 10000 a week im furious

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Poll

No poll attached to this discussion.

In this Discussion