The views below are submitted by registered users of evertonfc.com and do not necessarily reflect the views of Everton Football Club. View the Blueroom acceptable usage policy.

4 - 5 - 1.. Why are we playing this formation at home against **** teams?
  • nikkibell
    Posts: 7
    Discuss
  • Warrington Dan
    Posts: 8,869
    Because we're not a 4-4-2 team and only a few teams play that formation 
  • Jay McD
    Posts: 1,206
    I'm more worried about the next 5 games. We haven't really played anyone good yet.

  • milky71
    Posts: 9,136
    It's a fair point though.

    We started 451 but surely when you are losing you could try a different formation.
  • nikkibell
    Posts: 7
    we play better when we adjust to 4 -4 -2

    4 5 1 is boring and negative.. why defend it?
  • Warrington Dan
    Posts: 8,869
    nikkibell said:

    we play better when we adjust to 4 -4 -2

    4 5 1 is boring and negative.. why defend it?



    I'd rather play 4-5-1 and win boringly instead of playing 4-4-2 and drawing 4 all
  • kingmoyes
    Posts: 1,841
    we are skunk pwsis.................  fack off everton
  • nikkibell
    Posts: 7

    nikkibell said:

    we play better when we adjust to 4 -4 -2

    4 5 1 is boring and negative.. why defend it?



    I'd rather play 4-5-1 and win boringly instead of playing 4-4-2 and drawing 4 all


    You must be fun at a party
  • grahamglover
    Posts: 3
    Rubbish.....just rubbish !...make no mistake, we're a mediocre mid table team at best. No better than the likes of West Brom, Fulham, Wolves, Stoke ...etc...etc
    Glad I gave up my season ticket !
  • lukep08
    Posts: 309

    Because we're not a 4-4-2 team and only a few teams play that formation 




    because everyone plays 4-3-3 or a sort of formation like that, no one players 4-5-1 anymore its boring and predictable, we have been absolutly shocking like we are when teams come to park the bus, moyes hasnt a clue what to do.
  • Warrington Dan
    Posts: 8,869
    nikkibell said:

    nikkibell said:

    we play better when we adjust to 4 -4 -2

    4 5 1 is boring and negative.. why defend it?



    I'd rather play 4-5-1 and win boringly instead of playing 4-4-2 and drawing 4 all


    You must be fun at a party


    Don't go parties. They're far too exciting to me. 
  • nikkibell
    Posts: 7
    We cant break teams like WBA down... This is going  to be a painful season

    4 5 1 is Anti football
  • scottdblue
    Posts: 264
    fellineee nee neee
  • nikkibell
    Posts: 7
    Phew!
  • NotoriousEfc
    Posts: 37

    nikkibell said:

    we play better when we adjust to 4 -4 -2

    4 5 1 is boring and negative.. why defend it?



    I'd rather play 4-5-1 and win boringly instead of playing 4-4-2 and drawing 4 all


    Yeah but we don't look like winning until we switch to 4-4-2!!! We don't win with the 4-5-1 formation.
  • Knoxy2001e
    Posts: 1,430
    there is little to choose between most mid-order teams in the epl. they are all well organised by managers who know what they are doing. apart from the newcomers, i really dont think you can point to any particularly "weak" team.
  • nypdblues
    Posts: 125
    we struggle big time to break down teams who sit back and are well organised, we're just not good enough to consistently create chances by trying to play football through these teams, were also not good enough when these teams break on us, we nearly always concede a goal. last year we'd have drawn against wigan and be out the league cup but we've got a bit of luck this year so far and hopefully we can get some more confidence now and improve.

    bit worried about the upcoming city game but if anything we're more suited to this type of game, doing to city what teams like west brom do to us.
  • sambo applecart
    Posts: 24,751
    WE DONT PLAY 4-5-1.

    West Brom played 4-5-1.

    We played 4-4-1-1.

    The difference being we play 2 infront of the back 4, WBA play 3, what happens when you lose the ball in their final 3rd?? They pick the ball up and over run you if your playing 4-4-2 on the counter attack cos of the 3 they play in front of the back 4, they can swamp you, this is why we dont play 4-4-2 imo...........
  • weverett
    Posts: 137

    WE DONT PLAY 4-5-1.

    West Brom played 4-5-1.

    We played 4-4-1-1.

    The difference being we play 2 infront of the back 4, WBA play 3, what happens when you lose the ball in their final 3rd?? They pick the ball up and over run you if your playing 4-4-2 on the counter attack cos of the 3 they play in front of the back 4, they can swamp you, this is why we dont play 4-4-2 imo...........



    The off-striker mid doesnt cover against the counter.  We sacrifice the ability to finish in exchange for... well.... hrm...  um.... uh... well cahill sure plays a lot.
  • 11blue
    Posts: 4,765
    It was like we were playing for a draw last night because of the negative tactics. All we did was pass the ball left and right and I can't believe we scored two goals, and even that took of over 100 minutes.
  • sambo applecart
    Posts: 24,751
    11blue said:

    It was like we were playing for a draw last night because of the negative tactics. All we did was pass the ball left and right and I can't believe we scored two goals, and even that took of over 100 minutes.






    OUTSIDE, NOW!

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Poll

No poll attached to this discussion.

In this Discussion