The views below are submitted by registered users of evertonfc.com and do not necessarily reflect the views of Everton Football Club. View the Blueroom acceptable usage policy.
JamesF said:I thought he'd do better but he was decent for his first game. He's meant to have a good long shot but I didn't see much evidence of that, skewing one very wide from outside the box.
-----------------
JamesF said:I thought he'd do better but he was decent for his first game. He's meant to have a good long shot but I didn't see much evidence of that, skewing one very wide from outside the box.
HOWIE8 said:
JamesF said:I thought he'd do better but he was decent for his first game. He's meant to have a good long shot but I didn't see much evidence of that, skewing one very wide from outside the box.
Totally ridiculous thread, on the pitch for 9 minutes, and you thought he would have done better........how old are you ?and have you ever played football to any standard mate?
-----------------
JamesF said:12? Funny, I would have said the same thing about you given the childish insults. I've been keen to see him in action ever since he was signed and thought he came on earlier in the match but maybe I was mistaken. Still, even 10 minutes is something if not enough to see his real ability.
-----------------
11blue said:There is no way you can judge the lad on 5
minutes. I think he is a good squad player to have but we will have to
wait and see what he does.
-----------------
HOWIE8 said:2miutues!!!!!, wow envious mate im very envious......
-----------------
OldGoldenVision said:To be fair to james... It only takes on average five minutes of any given match for phil neville to prove he shouldnt be on the pitch...
-----------------
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!