The views below are submitted by registered users of evertonfc.com and do not necessarily reflect the views of Everton Football Club. View the Blueroom acceptable usage policy.

KEIOC and the Blue Union
  • MavisCruet
    Posts: 1,794
    I don't know if anyone one here has been on political demonstrations or protests, but no matter what the protest, Socialist Worker and someone from.Reclaim the Streets are always heavily involved.





    KEIOC opposed the Kirkby move for traditions. The Tesco Value stadium would have increased our revenue. Our lack of revenue is our biggest failing.





    To sell the club, the owners must change. This means Kenwright out. But the aim is not to depose Kenwright.





    Can anyone clear up these seeming contradictions?
  • zagan
    Posts: 4,695
    .......nope lol
  • [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0
    was the protest even shown on tv?
  • bluejon2
    Posts: 285
    scottdblue said:

    was the protest even shown on tv?


    Nope! I think Gabby said on final score 'there was a protest before the game at GP, because we haven't bought any new players????? ha,ha,ha, the power of the blue onions!!
  • MavisCruet
    Posts: 1,794

    I don't want this to turn into a slanging match, I was genuinely wondering.

    It seems that the people will not allow Kenwright any choices, increasing revenue - DK, or reducing overheads - selling Yak, Arteta, Vaughan, lanky striker whose name I have forgotten.

  • [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0
    what else could they do after the protest yesterday? did they think that protest would bring somone strait in or is it a sign of things to come? 
  • [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0
    MavisCruet said:

    I don't want this to turn into a slanging match, I was genuinely wondering.

    It seems that the people will not allow Kenwright any choices, increasing revenue - DK, or reducing overheads - selling Yak, Arteta, Vaughan, lanky striker whose name I have forgotten.





    i thought yesterday was really negative, keoic may think they saved the club but how many times have we talked about moving grounds.
  • MavisCruet
    Posts: 1,794
    scottdblue said:

    MavisCruet said:

    I don't want this to turn into a slanging match, I was genuinely wondering.

    It seems that the people will not allow Kenwright any choices, increasing revenue - DK, or reducing overheads - selling Yak, Arteta, Vaughan, lanky striker whose name I have forgotten.





    i thought yesterday was really negative, keoic may think they saved the club but how many times have we talked about moving grounds.



    I have to say I would rather Everton stay in your city (I was born a river away) and the council have been next to useless helping us, but the options being what they were, we could have increased corporate sponsorship, could have uncreased revenue from extra seating, sold naming rights etc.

    That may have steered us away from sailing this close to the wind.

  • [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0
    MavisCruet said:

    scottdblue said:

    MavisCruet said:

    I don't want this to turn into a slanging match, I was genuinely wondering.

    It seems that the people will not allow Kenwright any choices, increasing revenue - DK, or reducing overheads - selling Yak, Arteta, Vaughan, lanky striker whose name I have forgotten.





    i thought yesterday was really negative, keoic may think they saved the club but how many times have we talked about moving grounds.



    I have to say I would rather Everton stay in your city (I was born a river away) and the council have been next to useless helping us, but the options being what they were, we could have increased corporate sponsorship, could have uncreased revenue from extra seating, sold naming rights etc.

    That may have steered us away from sailing this close to the wind.






    your not reading what i`m saying, there usually is no money for a new ground when we mention it so keoic did nothing but think they did. now there couseing riots before games, upsetting people in the ground, players and staff so if somone does come buy us there gona be even more of a gbsht and it`ll be nothing to do with them 
  • MavisCruet
    Posts: 1,794
    scottdblue said:

    MavisCruet said:

    scottdblue said:

    MavisCruet said:

    I don't want this to turn into a slanging match, I was genuinely wondering.

    It seems that the people will not allow Kenwright any choices, increasing revenue - DK, or reducing overheads - selling Yak, Arteta, Vaughan, lanky striker whose name I have forgotten.





    i thought yesterday was really negative, keoic may think they saved the club but how many times have we talked about moving grounds.



    I have to say I would rather Everton stay in your city (I was born a river away) and the council have been next to useless helping us, but the options being what they were, we could have increased corporate sponsorship, could have uncreased revenue from extra seating, sold naming rights etc.

    That may have steered us away from sailing this close to the wind.






    your not reading what i`m saying, there usually is no money for a new ground when we mention it so keoic did nothing but think they did. now there couseing riots before games, upsetting people in the ground, players and staff so if somone does come buy us there gona be even more of a gbsht and it`ll be nothing to do with them 



    I did read it, and understand and agree, then I started typing and went off on totally my own tangent, so sorry about that.


    I concur :)

  • [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0
    MavisCruet said:

    scottdblue said:

    MavisCruet said:

    scottdblue said:

    MavisCruet said:

    I don't want this to turn into a slanging match, I was genuinely wondering.

    It seems that the people will not allow Kenwright any choices, increasing revenue - DK, or reducing overheads - selling Yak, Arteta, Vaughan, lanky striker whose name I have forgotten.





    i thought yesterday was really negative, keoic may think they saved the club but how many times have we talked about moving grounds.



    I have to say I would rather Everton stay in your city (I was born a river away) and the council have been next to useless helping us, but the options being what they were, we could have increased corporate sponsorship, could have uncreased revenue from extra seating, sold naming rights etc.

    That may have steered us away from sailing this close to the wind.






    your not reading what i`m saying, there usually is no money for a new ground when we mention it so keoic did nothing but think they did. now there couseing riots before games, upsetting people in the ground, players and staff so if somone does come buy us there gona be even more of a gbsht and it`ll be nothing to do with them 



    I did read it, and understand and agree, then I started typing and went off on totally my own tangent, so sorry about that.


    I concur :)




    ahah go for it, was glad to get a reply
  • happyhound
    Posts: 156
    MavisCruet said:

    I don't know if anyone one here has been on political demonstrations or protests, but no matter what the protest, Socialist Worker and someone from.Reclaim the Streets are always heavily involved.





    KEIOC opposed the Kirkby move for traditions. The Tesco Value stadium would have increased our revenue. Our lack of revenue is our biggest failing.

    yes i can clear up the contracdictions nicely for you!

    The blue onions and the other noobs will say anything they want just to cause aggro and because they like the sound of their own voices.
    They say many contradictory and stupid things!
    They repeat them alot which just makes them look repeatedly stupid.
    They then try to intimidate and shout down other people who disagree with their opinion.
    Then they try to sell ya a shirt or a really bad scarf so they can all meet up in the alehouse and tell each other how great they are!

    Shower of idiots of all of them!!!!!





    To sell the club, the owners must change. This means Kenwright out. But the aim is not to depose Kenwright.





    Can anyone clear up these seeming contradictions?



  • MavisCruet
    Posts: 1,794
    Is there anyone who supports them willing to propose answers?
  • [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0
    MavisCruet said:

    Is there anyone who supports them willing to propose answers?

    MavisCruet said:


    MavisCruet said:

    i have a ring and willing to propose to you :D lord of the rings one, got it on fleebay 




  • MavisCruet
    Posts: 1,794
    scottdblue said:

    MavisCruet said:

    Is there anyone who supports them willing to propose answers?

    MavisCruet said:


    MavisCruet said:

    i have a ring and willing to propose to you :D lord of the rings one, got it on fleebay 






    I am sure you're a lovely lad, but I do demand quite large knockers
  • [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0
    MavisCruet said:

    scottdblue said:

    MavisCruet said:

    Is there anyone who supports them willing to propose answers?

    MavisCruet said:


    MavisCruet said:

    i have a ring and willing to propose to you :D lord of the rings one, got it on fleebay 






    I am sure you're a lovely lad, but I do demand quite large knockers






    like this
    Wladimir-Klitschko166.jpg
    319 x 409 - 99K
  • MavisCruet
    Posts: 1,794

    img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Rf9S3GkkeyI/TAuTl4LZCdI/AAAAAAAAbl0/wiFFfmKvBvw/s1600/gianna+michaels.+
    image
    ">


    More like that

  • [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0
    lol

    anyway, just who were those yorksire people at the front of the protest
  • MavisCruet
    Posts: 1,794
    No idea, maybe they include whippets in the 600?
  • [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0
    MavisCruet said:

    No idea, maybe they include whippets in the 600?




    lol maybe
  • Beano
    Posts: 3,247
    This isn't even the half of it - Did you see thir statement this morning?

    They're a pack of self importamnt idiots. really they are and I am getting more and more irratated by the amount of talk there is about them (yes I know I'm doing it now too)

    From the embarrasment of presenting letters to the players/management at Finch Farm (they actually think they're really important to them), to taking credit for the improved performance of the team and resultant better atmosphere, to accusing the club of causing divide by putting up images of the chairman on screen (something that the club does not direct - it is directed by the broadcaster....i.e Sky or BBC). More than half of their statement this morning was all about critising the club for something they didn't do at all!

    Of course, they'll take responsibility only for things that suit them - when it comes to the fact that the attendance was "The lowest we had for a 3pm Saturday home league game in 9 years", oh...that's to do with the club and nothing to do with their protest or the possibilty of trouble causing fans to stay away - especially those who bring young kids!

    The above has combined to make yet another BU statement look like they're a pack of absolute idiots...AGAIN!!
Add a Comment

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Forum

Poll

No poll attached to this discussion.

In this Discussion