The views below are submitted by registered users of evertonfc.com and do not necessarily reflect the views of Everton Football Club. View the Blueroom acceptable usage policy.

3 - 0 flattered us.
  • Knoxy2001e
    Posts: 1,424
    swansea took our defence apart with ease too often for my liking. 3 - 2 would have been a more realistic result.

    what can the boss do, if anything, to tighten up our areas of weakness?
  • DRINGO
    Posts: 655
    ARE YOU KIDDING ? 31 SHOTS WE HAD ! COULD OF BEEN A LOT MORE THAN 3 !
  • blue32years
    Posts: 16,299
    Ignore knoxy

    He's what the ancient Greeks used to call a cuntus.
  • sambo applecart
    Posts: 24,216
    LOL, Knoxy, you must have only seen the highlights pal that's all i can think......if they should have had 2, we should have had at LEAST 6. 
  • Warrington Dan
    Posts: 8,859
    Vic and Felli missed an absolute sitter each.
  • murray1878
    Posts: 2,877
    Obviously didnt watch game or this post is just a joke. 3-2? really??????????

    Yes swansea could easily of had a couple just as we could easily of had 6 or 7
  • Beano
    Posts: 3,283
    While it's true that we should have scored about 7 (even allowing for some misses), it is still a valid point that our defense hasn't looked good enough....ever since half time in the Villa game really!

    There's a lot of issues that need to be sorted here ASAP!
  • Snipellis11
    Posts: 125
    If they could have had 2 we could have had 7.
  • Phantomblue
    Posts: 421
    blue32years said:

    Ignore knoxy

    He's what the ancient Greeks used to call a cuntus.


    -----------------


    and in old Roman'sh Cuntus Maximus.

    but really, did you watch the game.. I'm not talking about highlight on MOTD... i mean the full 90mins. Teams are always going to get chances in over the whole game.
    If you did watch the full 90, watch a replay, and if you still think the same, take a good look at yourself in the mirror and consider watching darts   




  • OldGoldenVision
    Posts: 19,512
    Suspect ob-knoxy-ious only caught motd...
  • bluetouch
    Posts: 1,230
    We should have had 7 we were all over them that's the game i watched anyway.
  • mikraz
    Posts: 2,158
    Everybody in the country thinks we could have had more and were good value for the score line except knoxy, its probably some catholic conspiracy.
  • Knoxy2001e
    Posts: 1,424
    "31 SHOTS WE HAD ! "


    so what? the only ones that count are the ones that go in.

    thats another problem, only 3 goals to show.

    i watched the match live and our defence was taken apart with ease (not for the first time this season) and by swansea; a mid table side at best. 

    look at the west brom game and the newcastle game. we didnt seem to have a clue how to handle demba ba when he came on.

    the defence is looking vulnerable. distain is probably in his last season, hibbo is in his 30's; we need at least one new defender, maybe two. unless we've got someone coming thru the academy.
  • efc fan from kentucky
    Posts: 726
    Knoxy2001e said:

    null


    -----------------



    Well Demba Ba is pretty bad ****
  • AllAroundMyHat
    Posts: 776
    im inclined to agree..to an extent........yes we created lots of chances but the finishing was poor. fella and anichebe guilty the most. Swanseas chances were on target and the fact that Howard got man of the match says it all really.
    Our defence has looked shaky in recent games to be fair.

    Saying that, it was a great result and lets hope it continues
  • blue32years
    Posts: 16,299
    Knoxy2001e said:

    null


    -----------------






    You said 3-2 would have been a fair a result

    I assume your reasoning for this statement was that Swansea had 3 good chances.


    When counter argued with how many chances we had you say ' so what ' ?


    Not many teams will put 3 past Swansea at their place.


    As stated before , you're a c*nt. a c*nt who hasn't got a clue.




    Stick to watching sports you understand.
  • sambo applecart
    Posts: 24,216
    Knoxy2001e said:

    so what? the only ones that count are the ones that go in.


    -----------------



    Swansea's don't count then cos none of them went in.


    So we won 3-0.


    The end.
  • 83EvertonFC
    Posts: 546
    sambo applecart said:

    Swansea's don't count then cos none of them went in.



    So we won 3-0.

    </<br />div>

    The end.

    -------
    ----------



    Nice
  • Knoxy2001e
    Posts: 1,424
    this isnt about swanseas not going in. its about our defence being dismantled by an inferior team too easily and too many times for comfort.
  • blue32years
    Posts: 16,299
    Then why did you say a more realistic result would of been 3-2 ?




    Oh yeah , I remember


    Cos you're a f*cking idiot.
  • AllAroundMyHat
    Posts: 776
    blue32. you really are a crude boy arent you.  just because he disagrees with you, you hurl that kind of language at him.
    ur just making yourself look like a prat.
Add a Comment

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Forum

Poll

No poll attached to this discussion.

In this Discussion