The views below are submitted by registered users of evertonfc.com and do not necessarily reflect the views of Everton Football Club. View the Blueroom acceptable usage policy.

What do the Anti-BU brigade make of this statement?
  • The Prophet
    Posts: 75

    ToffeeCup said:


    I wish you'd change back into Street Sinatra or whatever it was.


    You were much more palatable then



    Catty.
  • ToffeeCup
    Posts: 3,043


    ToffeeCup said:


    I wish you'd change back into Street Sinatra or whatever it was.


    You were much more palatable then



    Catty.



    Not a jot, just accurate.
  • The Prophet
    Posts: 75
    Unnecessarily catty too, I'd say.
  • PIPSFX
    Posts: 12
    I am totally in utter disbelief that the police actually sanctioned this BU march down Goodison Road BEFORE the game with Aston Villa. "paddyryan" had it all in a nutshell, he contended that it would have served their purpose more if the walk took place AFTER the game as those who were interested could remain to join them, and those who don't see eye to eye with their protest could disperse like good law-abiding citizens. I personally contend that they are seeking notoriety by having the pros and cons come together on Goodison Road, which runs the risk of actually resulting in a conflict which could then result in damaging media coverage of our club. I think the police are actually demonstrating a lack of awareness of the potential for a riot occurring and it is always better to prepare for safety than be sorry afterwards. 
  • the parkendkid
    Posts: 65

    milky71 said:

    I believe Howie may be right though.

    I have encountered Halfwits,idiots and the like from the BU on twitter.



    Then you're just as devisive as you claim they are.

    There are many decent BU supporters. I know plenty. Anybody speaking in general terms about any group is usually deeply flawed.



    And yet you call people "deeply flawed" if they call a group names...bit contradictory there aren't you !!
  • The Prophet
    Posts: 75
    Not contradictory at all..

    I said that anybody who speaks in general terms about any group is usually deeply flawed. Generalisations are almost always wrong.

    It's worrying that you don't see a difference between what I said, and what you claim I said.
  • ToffeeCup
    Posts: 3,043

    Unnecessarily catty too, I'd say.




    nonsense. I mean it in a good way. There is something about that picture and your text on the internet that makes even the most mild mannered person want to punch you repeatedly.

    Sack it off, and bring back street sinatra
  • the parkendkid
    Posts: 65
    anybody who speaks in general terms about any group is usually deeply flawed....meaning and i'll break it down..

    anybody....meaning singularly a person...who speaks in general terms...ie: name calling as you accuse them of..ie: " etc..they're all idiots"..is deeply flawed...thereby the individual calling the group names.. is deeply flawed....thus you "the kettle" calling the the pot "the name callers" black !!! so to speak...
  • HOWIE8
    Posts: 7,580


    HOWIE8 said:

    Howie, you have a problem with them using the term "real evertonians" but you don't seem to object to people on here labelling the Blue Union and their supporters as "halfits", "idiots" and the likes. This goes for many of you on here!

    I'm still on the fence about the blue Union... but the hypocrisy here is dumbfounding.



    Sorry mate but i dont go in for name calling, and so i dont have to comment thats for others to do. I believe in the power of speach, in a reasonable respectful way, hence why ive never called them any of the names you mentioned. No hypocrisy there mate, i dont believe they are right, but i dont call them names,,,,, ok PRO


    I think you missed my point somewhere along the line, Howie. I never accused you of calling anybody names.


    perfectly understood, your inference that i condoned the use of the names............... Ithought i'd just make it clear that i dont, will try and be a bit clearer for you next time, my apologies!!!
  • The Prophet
    Posts: 75

    ToffeeCup said:

    Unnecessarily catty too, I'd say.




    nonsense. I mean it in a good way. There is something about that picture and your text on the internet that makes even the most mild mannered person want to punch you repeatedly.

    Sack it off, and bring back street sinatra


    I'll go back to Street Sinatra if you bring back your dots. Your power was in your dots!

    Anyway, I tried to change my alias but milky banned me for having a duplicate account.
  • ToffeeCup
    Posts: 3,043


    ToffeeCup said:

    Unnecessarily catty too, I'd say.




    nonsense. I mean it in a good way. There is something about that picture and your text on the internet that makes even the most mild mannered person want to punch you repeatedly.

    Sack it off, and bring back street sinatra


    I'll go back to Street Sinatra if you bring back your dots. Your power was in your dots!

    Anyway, I tried to change my alias but milky banned me for having a duplicate account.





    .......Milky.......ffs........there are reasons for banning an alias.......but that isn't it!...
  • milky71
    Posts: 8,784

    milky71 said:

    You've upset him now.

    The Pro can't handle being wrong



    I see you haven't changed.

    Shame really... I sort of hoped you had.



    Behave yourself

    You love me just the way i am as i doyou

    Hope the little one is growing well
  • The Prophet
    Posts: 75

    anybody who speaks in general terms about any group is usually deeply flawed....meaning and i'll break it down..

    anybody....meaning singularly a person...who speaks in general terms...ie: name calling as you accuse them of..ie: " etc..they're all idiots"..is deeply flawed...thereby the individual calling the group names.. is deeply flawed....thus you "the kettle" calling the the pot "the name callers" black !!! so to speak...



    To generalise is to group people together when you can't possibly know that they're all "idiots" or whatever you want to call them... so generalising people, by it's very nature, is usually flawed.

    I'm not sure what part of that statement of the obvious you have a problem with.

    Do you think generalising entire groups is not usually flawed then?

    Example: Evertonians are bitter. it's just as flawed as saying the BU are halfwits.

    P.S... can't believe I have to explain this to a grown man.
  • milky71
    Posts: 8,784
    ToffeeCup said:


    ToffeeCup said:

    Unnecessarily catty too, I'd say.




    nonsense. I mean it in a good way. There is something about that picture and your text on the internet that makes even the most mild mannered person want to punch you repeatedly.

    Sack it off, and bring back street sinatra



    I'll go back to Street Sinatra if you bring back your dots. Your power was in your dots!

    Anyway, I tried to change my alias but milky banned me for having a duplicate account.





    .......Milky.......ffs........there are reasons for banning an alias.......but that isn't it!...



    FFS i didn't ban anyone he was suspended for 3 days.

    The little drama queen does like the attention.
  • milky71
    Posts: 8,784

    anybody who speaks in general terms about any group is usually deeply flawed....meaning and i'll break it down..

    anybody....meaning singularly a person...who speaks in general terms...ie: name calling as you accuse them of..ie: " etc..they're all idiots"..is deeply flawed...thereby the individual calling the group names.. is deeply flawed....thus you "the kettle" calling the the pot "the name callers" black !!! so to speak...




    I missed you and your girly rants.
    To generalise is to group people together when you can't possibly know that they're all "idiots" or whatever you want to call them... so generalising people, by it's very nature, is usually flawed.

    I'm not sure what part of that statement of the obvious you have a problem with.

    Do you think generalising entire groups is not usually flawed then?

    Example: Evertonians are bitter. it's just as flawed as saying the BU are halfwits.

    P.S... can't believe I have to explain this to a grown man.


  • ToffeeCup
    Posts: 3,043

    anybody who speaks in general terms about any group is usually deeply flawed....meaning and i'll break it down..

    anybody....meaning singularly a person...who speaks in general terms...ie: name calling as you accuse them of..ie: " etc..they're all idiots"..is deeply flawed...thereby the individual calling the group names.. is deeply flawed....thus you "the kettle" calling the the pot "the name callers" black !!! so to speak...



    To generalise is to group people together when you can't possibly know that they're all "idiots" or whatever you want to call them... so generalising people, by it's very nature, is usually flawed.

    I'm not sure what part of that statement of the obvious you have a problem with.

    Do you think generalising entire groups is not usually flawed then?

    Example: Evertonians are bitter. it's just as flawed as saying the BU are halfwits.

    P.S... can't believe I have to explain this to a grown man.




    To be fair, if you've read the stuff the blue union have put out. And read about everything they have done. You'd have to be an idiot for not noticing that they are largely a bunch of idiots. Well, the ones doing the writing and talking at any rate.
  • The Prophet
    Posts: 75
    milky71 said:

    ToffeeCup said:


    ToffeeCup said:

    Unnecessarily catty too, I'd say.




    nonsense. I mean it in a good way. There is something about that picture and your text on the internet that makes even the most mild mannered person want to punch you repeatedly.

    Sack it off, and bring back street sinatra



    I'll go back to Street Sinatra if you bring back your dots. Your power was in your dots!

    Anyway, I tried to change my alias but milky banned me for having a duplicate account.





    .......Milky.......ffs........there are reasons for banning an alias.......but that isn't it!...



    FFS i didn't ban anyone he was suspended for 3 days.

    The little drama queen does like the attention.


    Still can't use my maka blue account. I liked that account!
  • ToffeeCup
    Posts: 3,043

    milky71 said:

    ToffeeCup said:


    ToffeeCup said:

    Unnecessarily catty too, I'd say.




    nonsense. I mean it in a good way. There is something about that picture and your text on the internet that makes even the most mild mannered person want to punch you repeatedly.

    Sack it off, and bring back street sinatra



    I'll go back to Street Sinatra if you bring back your dots. Your power was in your dots!

    Anyway, I tried to change my alias but milky banned me for having a duplicate account.





    .......Milky.......ffs........there are reasons for banning an alias.......but that isn't it!...



    FFS i didn't ban anyone he was suspended for 3 days.

    The little drama queen does like the attention.


    Still can't use my maka blue account. I liked that account.




    let him have that one Milky.........anything but this one.....kill it......kill it with fire
  • The Prophet
    Posts: 75
    I reckon this account riles all the right people -- I shall be keeping it.
  • milky71
    Posts: 8,784

    I reckon this account riles all the right people -- I shall be keeping it.




    Hahahahhahahaha

    Most posters are aware of your girly rants and self obsessed posting.

    Getting bored of you now you've mellowed too much after childbirth

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Poll

Toffeecup

In this Discussion