The views below are submitted by registered users of evertonfc.com and do not necessarily reflect the views of Everton Football Club. View the Blueroom acceptable usage policy.

sambo and his crew dont forget your tutus and dancing shoes for strictly 6.15pm tomorrow
  • callofduty
    Posts: 351
    lol
  • zagan
    Posts: 4,747
    You got issues with Sambo... you are obsessive and probably obese too.....
    You also need to go have a think about your "funny post's"..... Iv'e never read anything so dire and boring in all my life, custard guts... 
  • blue32years
    Posts: 16,908
    You know when youre lolling your own post





    It's time to kill yourself
  • callofduty
    Posts: 351
    rather be obseesive than a gay superman nice avatar
  • Warrington Dan
    Posts: 8,869
    I liked Smallville. Erica Durance, Laura Vandervoort and Kristin Kreuk were all fit as!
  • callofduty
    Posts: 351
    laura vandervoort is fit as ****
  • zagan
    Posts: 4,747

    rather be obseesive than a gay superman nice avatar


    -----------------



    at least I have an avatar, lard _arse....
  • CharlieCroker
    Posts: 1,051
    Good evening Mr. Codpiece.

    I see, from your thread title, that you have an interest in dance and dainty apparel. I would like to ask your advice regarding style and function, pertaining to clothing, as I am visiting my tailor next week. It is my intention to order, amongst other delights, a pair of ice-white PVC hotpants. I am already quite certain that the cut of the garment will be rakishly brief, and the fit at least one size too small. My conundrum concerns the details: should i have the zip at the back and the peephole at the front, or vice-versa? It has been suggested to me that the zip could go all the way round, with a latch at either end, similar to a sleeping bag. This would certainly provide the most practical solution, regarding speed, convenience and versatility. However, we like variety, don't we, and the peephole has the advantage that it is unlikely to be seen from a distance, providing an element of surprise. On the other hand, deleting the peephole altogether fosters an alluring coyness, don't you think? Also, as you must know: inconvenience provides its own frisson of excitement, what with all the fevered fumbling it entails.

    What would you prefer?

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Poll

No poll attached to this discussion.

In this Discussion